..that's more or less what I talked through with Amanda.
So, what's the take home?Well, overall, Amanda tells me that she is better off:
- She can walk her dog
- Do most things that she wants
- BUT she is far from 100% happy.
I do NOT think there's anything wrong with Amanda’s hip replacement.
Her case and x-ray films have been
reviewed by colleagues..AND I've offered Amanda a
second opinion.(as is standard in these tricky cases).
She agrees the new hip is okay. AND she's unlikely to need or choose revision hip surgery any time soon.
That's the right decision for her.
No doubt about it.BUT the conclusion is that the complexity in Amanda's case is
NOT currently captured by our
healthcare system.
And that can distort what we tell our patients about joint replacement..
Our healthcare system only counts numbers..
- Revision or not.
- Death or not.
Amanda is
very much alive, and her hip has
NOT been revised.
So to our current system Amanda's case counts as a
SUCCESS. That's important because that
information can influence the decisions other people make about
hip replacement.Measuring pain and function gives us a more complete picture.Outcome scores (or PROMs) provide us with some nuance.
Amanda is only 60 to 80% good.
I’ll return to the importance of good measurement again.
Like
good regulation it can appear
boring.
File it, perhaps, under
'boring' but..
'Vitally important'.And good measurement will play a major role in solving this problem..