Reasons to oppose CACR 15
Wildlife management must be science-based and flexible; constitutional rights make it harder to adjust seasons, limits, and protections as conditions change.
Making hunting a right could be used to challenge Fish and Game rules, such as the ban on bobcat hunting. In other states where hunting has been made a constitutional right, lawsuits have been filed challenging regulations like Sunday hunting bans. Defending against lawsuits will be costly to NH taxpayers.
New Hampshire's Constitution is meant to establish our most fundamental rights and outline how government is organized and operates. It is not intended to enshrine specific recreational activities, such as hunting, above others.
CACR15 is a solution in search of a problem. Hunting and fishing are already legal, regulated, and protected; adding them to the NH constitution would introduce unnecessary risk and rigidity without providing meaningful new protections.