..is it good enough to write that our own osteoarthritis is
‘something that just happens’?
I don't think so..
BUT that is actually what medical school taught me(Well, it was last century)NOT in so many words.
We called it ‘primary’ osteoarthritis.
‘Primary’ osteoarthritisThat label came with a shrug of the shoulders:
‘it’s primary... it just happens’. And I nodded along. I accepted the terminology. No questions asked.
NOW I realise that, back then, we simply did not know
We didn't know what was underlying most osteoarthritis.
The knowledge, information and, indeed, the data wasn't there to describe what was happening.
Our understanding has got much better over the last 30+ years of my career.
Crumbs, I can’t believe THAT's the number I’m writing down..To be fair to 20th century pathologists and surgeons.
Our imaging has got dramatically better..
Better measurement + data is one of my key themes.
And better scans are part of that..
Better scans Better scans now measure the really detailed anatomy of our joints.
Better scans => Better data => Better information => Better Knowledge => Better Outcome- Information is data in context.
- Knowledge is applied information.
- The Outcome = ⬇ pain ⬆ function.
Better scans reveal the anatomy that leads to inflammation
That leads to cartilage damage, from..
- mild to
- moderate through to
- bone-on-bone osteoarthritis.
Better measurement / data has been and is key. Let's look at some examples..
Knees firstLong leg x-ray film taken from pelvis to foot show subtle deformities in the long bones of the leg..